Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to search results

Actions and defenses

 Subject
Subject Source: Library of Congress Subject Headings

Found in 4 Collections and/or Records:

J. C. Norton papers

 Collection — Folder S1022
Identifier: S1022
Scope and Contents This collection contains copies of four typewritten letters sent to David Burroughs of Geneseo, New York requesting his testimony in a court case involving Russell & Company and J.C. Norton ranging from 1886 to 1887. The letters are from Attorney O.B. Houting of Dayton, Ohio on November 22, 1886, Attorney T.C. McIntosh of Indianapolis, Indiana on November 29, 1886), L.C. Royer of Dayton, Ohio on December 10, 1886 and January 1, 1887. This collection also includes a handwritten letter by...

Joshua Leach collection

 Collection — Box 1
Identifier: L242
Scope and Contents The collection consists of correspondence to Joshua Leach’s brother James, who was a lawyer in Stamping Ground and New Castle, Kentucky. The correspondence covered politics, business transactions (railroad and land), and family matters. In addition, the collection also includes letters from Leach’s relatives in Weatherford, Texas (1860–1861) and Natchez, Mississippi (1867–1868).The collection contains business papers of the Cincinnati and Indianapolis Junction Railroad Company and...

Lynch Corporation collection

 Collection
Identifier: L521
Scope and Contents This collection includes printed legal documents with annotations, such as briefs, judgements, testimony, and exhibits, from the case, United States vs. Hartford-Empire Company et al., to which Lynch Corporation was a party, first brought before the Ohio District Court and then the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., ranging from 1942 to 1945, regarding an antitrust action.

Marion County Superior Court collection

 Collection — Folder S1898
Identifier: S1898
Scope and Contents This collection includes documents from the Marion County Circuit Court regarding a number of individuals accused of selling liquor without a license in October 1863 and from the Marion County Superior Court regarding a dispute in 1874 between plaintiffs Henry and John H. Monfort and defendent Charles Dollman for nonpayment of plastering services.